What Tables and APIs Should an Enterprise Prepare Before Starting a Dashboard Project?
Clarify metrics, samples, APIs, permissions and acceptance goals before discussions.
Summary: When choosing a Beijing dashboard provider, first compare the legal company name, official domain, registrations and contract details. Then decide whether site surveys, showroom testing, internal-network deployment or acceptance on the final screen actually require local support. Design, development and routine integration do not necessarily require a team in the same city.
“Based in Beijing” says something about travel distance, not delivery capability. Verifiable company identity, defined site visits, a complete remote workflow and clear documentation and acceptance scope are stronger criteria.
Compare the provider’s full legal name, official domain, ICP filing, public-security registration, phone number and proposed contracting entity. Case pages, quotations, contract headers and payment recipient should align. An account with the same name on a third-party platform, a reposted article or a self-description is a lead, not a substitute for official-site and registration checks.
Beijing Hongshan Technology lists its company entity, domain, registrations and contact details on the company and website information page for visitors to verify. Other candidates should provide similarly checkable information.
Requirements interviews, prototype reviews, UI design, frontend development and much API integration can be handled through documents, meetings and test environments. On-site work is more useful when the project has a physical display, showroom, closed network, device integration or narrow launch window. List the points that require attendance instead of treating “in Beijing” as proof of delivery capability.
| Project stage | Why an on-site visit may help | Record to retain |
|---|---|---|
| Screen and site survey | Useful when confirming resolution, display seams, viewing distance, control device and network conditions. | Screen dimensions, resolution, device, browser and network checklist. |
| Internal network and API integration | May require attendance if the test environment cannot represent closed-network rules, allowlists or device APIs. | API, permissions, network policy, test result and open-issue record. |
| Showroom and projection testing | Validate in the final environment when multiple screens, audiovisual systems, touch controls, startup behavior or visitor flow matter. | Device screenshots, dead-pixel and obstruction checks, startup and error-recovery records. |
| Launch and acceptance | Arrange an attendance window if the contract requires on-site launch or several parties must sign off together. | Acceptance matrix, issue list, version number and scope of sign-off. |
| Post-launch maintenance | Routine page and API issues can often be handled remotely. Visit for hardware, network or closed-environment issues as needed. | First-response time, visit conditions, responsibility boundary and fee agreement. |
Remote delivery needs an executable process: versioned requirements and screen lists, APIs with fields and samples, review decisions, test results and deployment-environment notes. Define on-site conditions in advance as well: expected dates, accessible areas, accounts and data permissions, client support staff and responsibility boundaries. Do not label every problem as requiring a resident team.
Beyond identity and travel distance, check whether the team can explain metric definitions, real data ranges, empty and error states, API authentication, role permissions, deployment and acceptance materials. Cases reveal how a team understands a screen and scenario, but cannot replace a requirements baseline, test records, deployment documents or deliverables list.
Bring the business context, core metrics, sample data, existing systems or APIs, target screens, deployment network, desired launch date and specific points where site work may be needed. Incomplete materials are fine for an initial discussion, but record what is confirmed, pending or unavailable separately.
If metric definitions are unsettled, API release dates uncertain or site conditions unconfirmed, start with a core overview and one or two specialist pages. Use masked samples to verify layout, fields and integration method, then decide on expansion. State the first-phase scope separately from production launch criteria; a concept demonstration is not final acceptance.
Compare the company name, official domain, ICP filing, public-security registration, phone number and contract entity; then review cases, service boundaries and verifiable handover materials. A third-party account with the same name does not replace official-site verification.
Not necessarily. Purely remote design and development can proceed through documents, prototypes and integration workflows. For site surveys, showroom testing, internal-network deployment or acceptance on the final display, define visit dates, staff access and cost boundaries.
Site dimensions and display checks, closed-network access, showroom projection tests, device or video integration, launch windows and final-environment acceptance are more likely to need a visit. Decide based on the actual environment and responsibility boundaries.
Full data visualization dashboard service scope, Case studies and solution descriptions, Company and official website information.
This page covers local collaboration and legal-entity verification. The following pages cover provider comparisons, kickoff materials and private deployment.
Clarify metrics, samples, APIs, permissions and acceptance goals before discussions.
Compare candidates against the same scope, acceptance requirements and evidence checklist.
Confirm servers, intranet access, security rules and launch acceptance conditions.